I never do memes, but saw this on the Chronicles of Tewkesbury and thought it interesting due to the interpretive nature of it. I have to say searching on my name brings up tons of naked pictures for some reason - so I had to go with one of those (Flickr has a lot of naked pictures I learned). And that third one - I had none of those in high school - so it seemed appropriate. Can you guys guess my search terms?
Want to give it a try? Here’s how:
The Questions:
1. What is your first name?
2. What is your favorite food?
3. What high school did you go to?
4. What is your favorite color?
5. Who is your celebrity crush?
6. Favorite drink?
7. Dream vacation?
8. Favorite dessert?
9. What you want to be when you grow up?
10. What do you love most in life?
11. One Word to describe you?
12. Your flickr name?
1. Spencer Tunick in Düsseldorf, 2. Pancakes with Vanilla Bananas (2/2), 3. First Grade Education 2, 4. Colour in the Country, 5. Scarlett Johansson, 6. Vacation Gin, 7. Shibuya Crossing at Night, 8. Bananas Foster, 9. Global, 10. Some Trains Go Nowhere, 11. Young Democrats of Greater St. Louis yard sign, 12. Speener in the Sun
Sphere: Related ContentThis is from the Senate race in Minnesota where Norm Coleman is running against Al Franken.
Talking Point of the day:
AP: “John McCain and Sarah Palin criticized Democrat Barack Obama over the amount of money he has requested for his home state of Illinois, even though Alaska under Palin’s leadership has asked Washington for 10 times more money per citizen for pet projects.”
The Palin talking points are amazing as is the ability of he Republican talking heads to sell it as if she’s Condeleeza Rice. ”Alaska is close to Russia.”
I saw this on Brendan Nyhan’s excellent political blog. CNN’s Campbell Brown simply embarrasses McCain spokesperson Tucker Bounds as he tries in vain to describe Palin’s commander in chief experience.
Sphere: Related ContentI couldn’t bear to watch Sarah Palin last night. I got through maybe 5 minutes, and decided that I’d watch television from people paid to write fiction as opposed to fiction from people who spout it as truth.
And what do I think of Palin? She spent the entire speech attacking Obama, but didn’t talk policy at all. Surprise, surprise - the Republicans don’t talk the issues. Here’s a woman that we’ve never heard anything about - who has no experience and they don’t go over her past, her experience, her story. No introduction to the people. Just shrill, shriller, and shrillest. Why - because she had nothing to say of value about herself or policy. Palin is worthless as a candidate because she is worthless as a President if that happens. If you listened to the Democrats last week, the attacks were all about his policy deficiencies - his support of George Bush; his lack of a plan for the economy; his temperament; this is what Democrats discussed. The Republicans? “Obama is all words”. “Obama is flashy”. Shrill and nasty attacks. Low and despicable. When you’re behind, misdirection is a good way to go. Make sure people don’t look at your failings by lying and creating false issues. They spent significant time attacking the media. Last I checked, CNN wasn’t running as a 3rd party candidate.
We knew this wasn’t going to be about issues when McCain hired a neophyte to be his running mate. Instead of getting a highly experienced running mate, he hired a better looking (not hard) Ann Coulter.
I don’t know if I’ll watch tonight. Conventions are for party members and the press, otherwise they’re useless.
This next 60 days can’t end fast enough for me.
Sphere: Related ContentJust 4 years old and my poor mac is as dead as a doornail. Actually not fully dead, but $900 to fix. Ugh. Was planning to buy something but not now.
Apple has it in for me this week.
Sphere: Related Content
First off - I’m not here to diminish Sarah Palin herself - she’s simply not qualified to be President of the United States. Yes she’s the governor of Alaska. She was also a small town mayor - with all this she brings the reputation of a straight talking reformist. She balances out the McCain ticket when it comes to ideology which will appeal to right wing nuts - I mean voters.
Basically, if you close one eye, squint with the other, and look at this, it all makes sense.
Who is Sarah Palin? Here’s some basic background:
It’s quite obvious with this pick that the McCain is attempting to woo Hillary Clinton voters disappointed with Barack Obama’s nomination. As if everyone voted for her simply because she’s a woman. It would be as if Alan Keyes would be a valid replacement for Obama because they’re both black. It’s insulting. And I’m sure that some former Clinton supporters will fall for it. Problem is, those voters were never going to vote for Obama anyway. But anyone who voted for Clinton based on her progressive record, healthcare advocacy, support for reproductive rights, her wealth of Senate experience - well, they’ll be sorely disappointed that John McCain thinks that Palin matches up to her.
You believe this pick was made on qualifications? Ask yourself this: until last Saturday, Hillary Clinton was still in the running for the democratic VP nomination; do you think that Palin would have received the nomination if Clinton was chosen? There’s nothing she brings outside of her gender that couldn’t have been brought by another candidate in that case. Mitt Romney brings a conservative rep. Rudy Guliani brings the tough talking.
OK - she brings one other thing - her youth. Kay Bailey Richardson would have been more sensible a choice, but at 65, she doesn’t fit the need. She does have loads of experience having been in the Senate since 1993. There’s that word: experience.
Which McCain are we to believe? The one that railed against Obama’s inexperience or the one that chose someone 3 years Obama’s junior, with significantly less experience than Obama (Obama has 8 years as an Illinois State Senator and 2 years as a U.S. Senator) as a possible Presidential replacement? Palin has no experience that shows her capable in regards to dealing foreign affairs, the defense, the threat of terrorism, or the management of the world’s largest economy. You have to wonder about his judgement and pragmatism.
Listening to the Republican spin on this is amazing. They’ve decided this was a brilliant and bold choice. To me it seems shortsighted and dangerous. I wondered how Republicans would respond in their national convention to the successful DNC. It appears now that their response is one of defiance and insult. Instead of bringing substance to the campaign with their choice for VP, they’ve decided to counter program with a choice based on visual and emotional appeal as opposed to policy expertise.
I thought Mitt Romney would have been a big mistake of a choice - since that would have put two multi-millionaires at the top of their ticket, but that would have made much more sense than this.
Sphere: Related ContentOstensibly A Rubber Door is about anything that's on my mind. Mostly that seems to be about politics, music, sports, and arguing with others about all of the above. I took the name of this blog from a Michael Penn song called Me Around. Check out Michael - he's about the best singer/songwriter there is.